Peace And Homosexuality

Heterosexuality is always assumed in the human, due to the nature of the animal he is supposed to be. But if the homosexuality always prevalent in his most advanced civilizations is proof that its presence in the male curbs the characteristic aggression with which he conquers territories, and thereby proves his being worthy of the mating ritual to the female partner; then that presence is obviously also proof that the homosexual is going to be the alpha male - when all men are not only one, but equal; and the heterosexual barbarians, extinct.

The two major instincts that drive a human being are that for food and that for sex. And, life being survival of the fittest, the natural instincts of the female always propel her to mate with the fittest male - his fitness being oft' accompanied by the aggression of barbaric conquests - that the species may survive. Yet, if that urge for sex can be satisfied without recourse to heterosexuality; then, obviously, the need for aggression in the male will no longer be recognised by Nature. Hence, the greater number of men (as compared to women) that have absolutely no sexual interest in the opposite gender; with both their sexual interests and their need for companionship met by another man. For a woman, on her own part, has to be either extremely old or extremely ugly before homosexuality in her can be with such an absolute thoroughness - Nature having deemed it satisfactory that the proof of healthy genes required by it, and of her (and her consequent attractions to the male) be no more than a body. But once a man discovers those interests in, and has that need for companionship met by another man; the fitness required to excel as a rich and powerful (and thereby convince his partner that the products of the mating will be equally fit - be the conviction risen out of his position in an office, and his role as figure-head in the home; or out of his affluence as a rich and powerful business tycoon) the impetus to be thereby fit will no longer be such a compulsive urge; and he will thereby usually withdraw into the inner sensitivity that had the natural introversion of the homosexual initially earn him the tag, invert; and that then creates in his sexuality an absolute homosexual orientation. In the words of Webster Schott:

The homosexual has a vision of such things that drive him to extraordinary intensity....Either because in lonely childhood the homosexual became better at introspective tasks or because of innate abilities related to sexual deviation, some homosexuals appear to possess greater proficiency in histrionics and dance, manipulation of color and shape, and esthetic expression.

But the heterosexual brute?

His close affinity with the animals in the wild can be aptly observed in the third largest national park in Tanzania - Katavi; by its most exciting wildlife spectacle, provided by the hippopotami. Towards the end of the dry season, up to two hundred of them might flop together in any riverine pool of sufficient depth. As more and more of them gather in one place, so does male rivalry heat up - bloody territorial fights become an everyday occurence; with the vanquished male forced to lurk hapless in the open plains, until it gathers sufficient courage to mount another challenge.

Such spectacles are a characteristic part of the lives of almost all males, in each and every species of all animals that reproduce sexually. The male has to prove not only the presence in him of virility, but also the absence in him of sterility; by conquering a territory, while the female patiently waits for the conqueror to mount her. And the heterosexual barbarians I have often written of (who are they that have always been part of every reversion to the primitive, whenever there has been a significant peak in civilization) are no more than the most visible examples of the beast in Man, when that reversion has occured; the females that are liberated in all the most barbaric cultures, the less visible examples of that human throwback to the beast in the wild. From the gang-wars on the streets, to cult clashes on Nigerian campuses, and on down to those grandiose battles between tribes and nations; the roaring alpha male struts with violence his virility, as often as the female rutting after him bares her body to flaunt her fertility - both, instinctively enough to always be subconsciously, to prove how ripe they are for the mating ritual. And the sight of the two reveals most convincingly that which I state with these words : heterosexuality in the human is the most visible manifestation of the beast in him. Without the rampaging rutting that characterises the sowing of a man's wild oats; the consequent spread of his genes that, instinctively, is then his primary aim (and that will be accepted by the female, equally instinctively, should she be assured of her offspring thereby inheriting genes fit enough to have them survive life) the spread of those genes will be greatly reduced, and - in the homosexual - made absolutely unnecessary by the greater creativity that always accompanies his sexuality, and that therefore allows him to attain the immortality being sought with no recourse to the beast in man.

It is a well-known fact amongst both intellectuals and academicians that the greatest human civilizations have always witnessed a tremendous increase in homosexuality - most especially amongst the male; and accompanied by an uncharacteristic societal acceptance of the orientation that in some cases even becomes the approval of worship. I would not want to conclude by saying that heterosexuality - most especially in the man - must therefore be as condemned as homosexuality usually is, for the evolution of man to progress. But I do have to say that which is obvious enough from the blind rage with which the wild heterosexual barbarians strive to conquer both themselves and others, and always incited (just as in the wild) by the female that always tags after him with a body bared by the fashion of almost every culture, however conservative; fashion demanding sexual favours by almost every woman, even the most principled; fashion thereby betraying the heat that is a characteristic feature of her life.....I do have to say once more from that which I see of all that, this: the raging of the human male and the rutting of his female are the most visible representation of the beast in him. And the spectacles of their own raging and rutting will be as extinct as violence and war will thereby be, when heterosexuality in the male human is remembered as the dinosaurs are, who once ruled the earth.

I cannot speak for the female homosexual; for those women that rut do tend to rut more often when lesbian, than when heterosexual - lesbianism being no more than the bisexuality of a woman in heat. Yet the struggle for the rights of marriage between couples of the male homosexual having always been more passionate than any that was ever waged by the female seems to suggest that male homosexuals do form stable relationships with each other much more than do lesbians. And I do know that the men that have won through life with absolutely no recourse to the violence characterising that of the animal in the wild have most often been homosexual. From Plato and Socrates, who had absolutely nothing to do with that violence; to Michelangelo Buonarroti, whose phenomenal rise above its evil brought him a spirituality others see only in religion; the placid peace of homosexuality that characterised their nature (as opposed to the battles with which the barbarian has to abide by the eternal rule of the woman: no finance, no romance) has had the vast majority of them inherit naturally the extremely high refinement in character that has the coarse heterosexual mock homosexuals with words such as queen, and pansy.

Alexander the Great (a man that inherited his title by becoming the greatest conqueror that ever strode down a battle-field) was not only homosexual, but had that sensitivity in him that always attracts derogatory titles from brutes and barbarians; despite the hardened character that has to be that of a man whose conquests are crowned by the gory glory of war. Unlike the vulgar male - who is no more than a bisexual on a rampage, even when supposedly homosexual; Alexander the Great had so little to do with the rutting that always accompanies war, when in the warrior, when in the wild; that he had not one single child by the time he died at the mere age of thirty years. Despite the rigidity with which ruggedness is encouraged in the warrior he was, despite the role his father should have played as an example of such ruggedness, despite the greatness of his that overshadows that of any other human being ever crowned by the conquests of war; Alexander the Great possessed a personality that would obviously have been exceedingly refined by one of the most expansive examples of education in his day. Taught by one of the most brilliant sages of all time, Aristotle; he learnt ethics, philosophy, political science, botany, anatomy, history, and literature with such an aesthetic sensitivity that he always had under his pillow a unique copy of Homer's Iliad (made for him with special notes by Aristotle) as opposed to the dagger also kept under the pillow; which proved his being as still that of a warrior, regardless of how little rugged.

Thus it is with every man that indeed is homosexual, and not merely a bisexual sowing wild oats. As often as the educated man has had homosexuality accompany both the reservation and the refinement of his heritage, however much of an extrovert he may be; the coarse illiterate has had its males roar their virility with violence, however murderous; and its females flaunt their fertility with prurience, however depraved. And between the one and the other is clearly obvious wherein the barbarian in man lies; be he male, or female. Hence the closer relationship men have with women (however well-clad by the camouflage of respectability borne by mothering) when involved in the usually depraved fertility rites of primitive tribes. Hence the closer relationship women have with fathers (however emasculated by the peace often accompanying education) when involved in the violence and the fraud that accompanies the pursuit of power and affluence. Hence the delicacy of refinement that is rarely ever seen in the heterosexual man, and in the bisexual the lesbian woman always turns out to be. This refinement will have peace rise as a permanent part of humanity, only when his sexuality has conquered heterosexuality enough for violence to be in vain.



(written in August, 2010; and first published in the blog, www.thefairiesconfraternity.blogspot.com)